Engenharia de ciências de dados: gestão curricular para a produção e o consumo responsáveis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17186649Palavras-chave:
produção e consumo responsáveis, engenharia de ciência de dados, estrutura de categorização de padrõesResumo
Introdução: dada a rapidez das mudanças tecnológicas, os engenheiros em Ciência de Dados desempenharão um papel crucial no impulso à inovação sustentável. Ao aplicar análise de dados, aprendizado de máquina e inteligência artificial, eles podem otimizar o uso de recursos, melhorar a eficiência energética e desenvolver modelos preditivos que ajudem a mitigar riscos sociais e ambientais. Objetivo: integrar a sustentabilidade na formação empresarial, especificamente no contexto da disciplina “Fundamentos de Organização Empresarial” do curso de Ciência de Dados da Universitat Politècnica de València (UPV, Espanha). Método: esta pesquisa qualitativa e construtivista baseia-se em uma investigação-ação educacional na disciplina FOE. São analisadas competências transversais e aplicado o Marco de Categorização de Padrões por meio de atividades práticas, integrando a sustentabilidade na análise empresarial. Propõe-se uma atividade final que incorpora essa ferramenta à disciplina. Resultados: é elaborada uma metodologia que introduz o “Compromisso Social e Ambiental” na formação de engenheiros em Ciência de Dados. Conclusão: os estudantes poderão enfrentar desafios sociais, ambientais e econômicos com ética e responsabilidade profissional, orientados pelos Objetivos de Desenvolvimento Sustentável, em especial o de Produção e Consumo Responsáveis.
Downloads
Referências
Accenture Strategy (2014). Circular Advantage. Accenture Strategy. https://www.accenture.com/t20150523T053139__w__/us-en/_acnmedia/Accenture/Conversion- Assets/DotCom/Documents/Global/PDF/Strategy_6/Accenture-Circular-Advantage-Innovative-Business-Models-Technologies-Value-Growth.pdf
Ahadov, A., Asgarov, E. S., & El-Thalji, I. (2019). A summary of adapting Industry 4.0 vision into engineering education in Azerbaijan. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 700(1), 012063. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/700/1/012063
Ahmad, I., Sharma, S., Singh, R., Gehlot, A., Priyadarshi, N., & Twala, B. (2022). Mooc 5.0: A roadmap to the future of learning. Sustainability, 14(18), 11199. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141811199
Alarifi, A., Zarour, M., Alomar, N., Alshaikh, Z., & Alsaleh, M. (2016). Secdep: Software engineering curricula development and evaluation process using SWEBOK. Information and Software Technology, 74, 114–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2016.01.013
Bahroun, Z., Anane, C., Ahmed, V., & Zacca, A. (2023). Transforming education: A comprehensive review of generative artificial intelligence in educational settings through bibliometric and content analysis. Sustainability, 15(17), 12983. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151712983
Bell, G. G., & Rochford, L. (2016). Rediscovering SWOT’s integrative nature: A new understanding of an old framework. The International Journal of Management Education, 14(3), 310-326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2016.06.003
Bellucci, M., Chiurco, A., Cimino, A., Ferro, D., Longo, F., & Padovano, A. (2022). Learning factories: A review of state of the art and development of a morphological model for an industrial engineering education 4.0. MELECON 2022 - IEEE Mediterranean Electrotechnical Conference, 260–265. https://doi.org/10.1109/MELECON53508.2022.9843084
Bizami, N. A., Tasir, Z., & Kew, S. N. (2023). Innovative pedagogical principles and technological tools capabilities for immersive blended learning: A systematic literature review. Education and Information Technologies, 28(2), 1373–1425. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11243-w
Bracho Fuenmayor, P. L. (2022). Gerencia y educación superior desde la perspectiva de la neurociencia. Interacción y Perspectiva, 12(2), 100-121. https://zenodo.org/records/7114562
Bonfield, C. A., Salter, M., Longmuir, A., Benson, M., & Adachi, C. (2020). Transformation or evolution?: Education 4.0, teaching and learning in the digital age. Higher Education Pedagogies, 5(1), 223–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/23752696.2020.1816847
Boni, A., Belda-Miquel, S., Calabuig-Tormo, C., Millán-Franco, M. A., & Talón-Villacañas, A. (2019). Adaptando los ODS a lo Local mediante la Educación para el Desarrollo. La Experiencia de la Estrategia de la Ciudad de Valencia. Revista Internacional de Educación Para La Justicia Social, 8(1), 117. https://doi.org/10.15366/riejs2019.8.1.007
Brundtland, G. H. (1987). Our common future—Call for action. Environmental conservation, 14(4), 291-294.
Curren, R. (2009). Education for sustainable development: A philosophical assessment. In Impact (Vol. 2009, Issue 18). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2048-416x.2009.tb00140.x
Díaz-Romero, Y., De La Paz-Rosales, M. T. de J., Callan-Bacilio, R., & Bracho-Fuenmayor, P. L. (2025). Análisis teórico-conceptual de la calidad en la educación superior y sus dimensiones: Un estudio comparado. Revista Arbitrada Interdisciplinaria Koinonía, 10(19), 110–133. https://doi.org/10.35381/r.k.v10i19.4379
Direito, I., & Freitas, A. (2024). Bridging the Gap: Embedding Transversal Skills in Engineering Doctoral Education. IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference, EDUCON, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON60312.2024.10578771
Esteban-Amaro, R., Estelles-Miguel, S., & Lengua, I. (2024). Towards sustainable business: Leading change from the bottom-up. WPOM-Working Papers on Operations Management, 15, 21587. https://doi.org/10.4995/wpom.21587
Fierro, C., Fortoul, B., y Rosas, L. (2000). Transformando la práctica docente, una propuesta basada en la investigación-acción. Paidós.
Font, L. R. (2012). Fundamentos de organización de empresas (FOE). Editorial Universitat Politècnica de València.
Foundation Ellen MacArthur (2015). Towards a Circular Economy: Business Rationale for an Accelerated Transition. Ellen MacArthur Foundation (EMF), 20.
García-Hurtado, D., Devece, C., Hoffmann, V. E., & Camargo-Vera, C. (2024). On entrepreneurial and ambidextrous universities: Comparative study in Ibero-American higher education institutions. Sustainable Technology and Entrepreneurship, 3(3), 100077. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stae.2024.100077
Gómez-Ríos, D., Ramírez-Malule, H., & Marriaga-Cabrales, N. (2023). Mesocurriculum modernization of a chemical engineering program: The case of a high-impact regional university in Colombia. Education for Chemical Engineers, 44, 181–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ece.2023.06.002
Hambrick, D. C., MacMillan, I. C., & Day, D. L. (1982). Strategic attributes and performance in the BCG matrix—A PIMS-based analysis of industrial product businesses. Academy of Management Journal, 25(3), 510-531.
Hassiotis, M.-K. (2020). Building a Circular Supply Chain for a Circular Economy. https://news.ewmfg.com/blog/building-a-circular-supply-chain-for-a-circular-economy
Henri, M., Johnson, M. D., & Nepal, B. (2017). A review of competency-based learning: Tools, assessments, and recommendations. Journal of Engineering Education, 106, 607–638. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20180
Johnston, R. B. (2016). Arsenic and the 2030 Agenda for sustainable development. Arsenic Research and Global Sustainability - Proceedings of the 6th International Congress on Arsenic in the Environment, AS 2016, 12–14. https://doi.org/10.1201/b20466-7
Kotler, P. (1967). Scanning the business environment. Business Horizons, 10(3), 51–58.
Latorre, A. (2005). La investigación-acción, conocer y cambiar la práctica educativa. Graó 5ª ed.
Learned, E. P., Christensen, C. R., Andrews, K. R., & Guth, W. D. (1969). Business policy: Text and cases. Richard D. Irwin.
López Velázquez, R., Carmona Montes de Oca, N., & Verchier Huizar, L. D. (2020). La investigación-acción como metodología para mejorar la práctica docente: Tres casos en México. UTE. Revista de Ciències de l’Educació, (2), 38–60. https://doi.org/10.17345/ute.2020.2
Malhotra, R., Massoudi, M., & Jindal, R. (2023). Shifting from traditional engineering education towards competency-based approach: The most recommended approach-review. Education and Information Technologies, 28, 9081–9111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11568-6
Padovano, A., & Cardamone, M. (2024). Towards human-AI collaboration in the competency-based curriculum development process: The case of industrial engineering and management education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, 100256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100256
Porter, M. E. (1985). Technology and competitive advantage. Journal of Business Strategy, 5(3), 60-78.
Porter, M. E. (1989). How competitive forces shape strategy. En D. E. Hussey (Ed.), Readings in strategic management (pp. 133–143). Macmillan Education UK.
Porter, M. E., & Millar, V. E. (1985). How information gives you competitive advantage. Harvard Business Review, 63(4), 149–160.
Puyt, R. W., Lie, F. B., & Wilderom, C. P. M. (2023). The origins of SWOT analysis. Long Range Planning, 56(3), 102304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2023.102304
Qian, Y., Vaddiraju, S., & Khan, F. (2023). Safety education 4.0 – a critical review and a response to the process industry 4.0 need in chemical engineering curriculum. Safety Science, 161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2023.106069
Raimo, N., Nicolò, G., L’Abate, V., & Vitolla, F. (2024). Analyzing the factors affecting university contributions to achieving the sustainable development goals in European Union countries. Sustainable Development, 32(3), 6033–6044. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.3013
Rosa, P., Sassanelli, C., & Terzi, S. (2019). Towards Circular Business Models: A systematic literature review on classification frameworks and archetypes. Journal of Cleaner Production, 236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117696
Sánchez-Carracedo, F., López, D., Martín, C., Vidal, E., Cabré, J., & Climent, J. (2020). The sustainability matrix: A tool for integrating and assessing sustainability in the bachelor and master theses of engineering degrees. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(14), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12145755
Škare, M., Blanco-Gonzalez-Tejero, C., Crecente, F., & del Val, M. T. (2022). Scientometric analysis on entrepreneurial skills - creativity, communication, leadership: How strong is the association? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 182, 121851. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121851
UPV. (2024). Informe Empleabilidad. https://www.upv.es/contenidos/sieobs/datos-hoy/https://www.upv.es/contenidos/sieobs/datos-hoy/
Villazon Montalvan, R. A., Affonso Neto, A., & Neumann, C. (2024). Developing soft skills in the business classrooms of industrial engineering students in Brazil. Journal of International Education in Business, 17(2), 304–318. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIEB-11-2023-0092
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2025 Estrategia y Gestión Universitaria
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
