Experiências docentes e fatores organizacionais vinculados à produtividade em pesquisa em uma universidade de Montería, Colômbia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22306395Palavras-chave:
ambiente organizacional, produtividade investigativa, desempenho académico, universidadeResumo
Introdução: as atividades de produção científica dos docentes universitários constituem atualmente um tema prioritário, pois foram observadas tendências institucionais que afetam esse indicador, o que evidencia a necessidade de realizar um estudo que contribua positivamente para desenvolver e visibilizar essa temática. Objetivo: explorar as experiências do corpo docente e o ambiente organizacional em termos de produtividade investigativa em uma universidade de Montería, Colômbia. Método: desenvolveu‑se um estudo qualitativo, descritivo e abrangente, por meio de entrevistas semiestruturadas; a população secundária alvo foi composta por docentes universitários. Resultados: a produtividade investigativa não constitui um resultado exclusivamente individual nem pode ser explicada apenas pela motivação, formação ou trajetória profissional do docente. Conclusão: considera‑se pertinente aprofundar aspectos diretamente relacionados ao tema, uma vez que constitui um eixo prioritário no que se refere à pesquisa escrita; dado que a ciência se constrói, em grande medida, a partir dessa produção, fomentar ações organizadas pelas instituições deve ser uma tarefa fundamental para garantir maior grau de rigor científico.
Downloads
Referências
Alqahtani, M. S., Abbas, M., Muqeet, M. A., & Almohiy, H. M. (2022). Research productivity in terms of output, impact, and collaboration for university researchers in Saudi Arabia: SciVal analytics and t-tests statistical based approach. Sustainability, 14(23), 16079. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142316079
Astegiano, J., Sebastián-González, E., & de Toledo Castanho, C. (2019). Unravelling the gender productivity gap in science: a meta-analytical review. Royal Society open science, 6(6), 181566. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.181566
Bastidas, C. B. (2019). Principios básicos de la formación docente para la investigación. Revista Iberica De Sistemas e Tecnologias De Informacao, (E21), IX-X. https://media.proquest.com/media/hms/PFT/1/yv4KC?_s=sCRjoCM2gmhqqvNPkMH6LwKRbsE%3D
Bender, E. M., Gebru, T., McMillan-Major, A., & Shmitchell, S. (2021). On the dangers of stochastic parrots: Can language models be too big? Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 610–623. https://doi.org/10.1145/3442188.3445922
Brignardello-Petersen, R., Santesso, N., & Guyatt, G. H. (2024). Systematic reviews of the literature: An introduction to current methods. American Journal of Epidemiology, 194(2), 536–542. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwae232
Calvo, G., Rendón Lara, D. B., & Rojas García, L. I. (2004). Un diagnóstico de la formación docente en Colombia. Revista Colombiana De Educación, (47). https://doi.org/10.17227/01203916.5519
Carta, M. G., Angermeyer, M. C., & Tagliagambe, S. (2021). The trend of scientific productivity of Chinese, European Union, and United States universities and private companies: Does the future belong to E-technology companies? Publications, 9(2), 18. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications9020018
Castillo Rocubert, N. (2010). Acerca de los Paradigmas de la investigación educativa. Mendive. Revista De Educación, 9(1), 16–24. https://mendive.upr.edu.cu/index.php/MendiveUPR/article/view/353
Christou, E., Parmaxi, A., & Zaphiris, P. (2025). A systematic exploration of scoping and mapping literature reviews. Universal Access in the Information Society, 24, 941–951. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-024-01120-3
Cui, R., Ding, H., & Zhu, F. (2022). Gender inequality in research productivity during the COVID-19 pandemic. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 24(2), 707–726. https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2021.0991
de Franco, M. F., & Solórzano, J. L. V. (2020). Paradigmas, enfoques y métodos de investigación: análisis teórico. Mundo recursivo, 3(1), 1-24. https://atlantic.edu.ec/ojs/index.php/mundor/article/view/38
Feng, R., Xie, Y., & Wu, J. (2024). How is personality related to research performance? The mediating effect of research engagement. Front. Psychol. 14:1257166. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1257166
Gómez, D., Carranza, Y., & Ramos, C. (2017). Revisión documental, una herramienta para el mejoramiento de las competencias de lectura y escritura en estudiantes universitarios. Revista Chakiñan de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, (1), 46-56. https://scielo.senescyt.gob.ec/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2550-67222017000300046
Guzmán-Valenzuela, C. (2017). Tendencias globales en educación superior y su impacto en América Latina: Desafíos pendientes. Lenguas Modernas, 50(50), 15-32. https://lenguasmodernas.uchile.cl/index.php/LM/article/view/49248
Haby, M. M., Barreto, J. O. M., Kim, J. Y. H., Peiris, S., Mansilla, C., Torres, M., Guerrero-Magaña, D. E., & Reveiz, L. (2024). What are the best methods for rapid reviews of the research evidence? A systematic review of reviews and primary studies. Research Synthesis Methods, 15(1), 2–20. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1664
Kwiek, M., & Roszka, W. (2024). The gendered persistence in research productivity among university professors: A longitudinal study. Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-023-01022-y
Kwon, E., Yun, J., & Kang, J. H. (2023). The effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on gendered research productivity and its correlates. Journal of Informetrics, 17(1), 101380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2023.101380
Leal, N. (2000). El método fenomenológico: principios, momentos y reducciones. Revista Electrónica de Investigación Científica, Humanística y Tecnológica, 1(5), 51-60. https://www.academia.edu/download/52192549/lealnestorepistemologia.pdf
Lee, K. G., Mennerat, A., Lukas, D., Dugdale, H. L., & Culina, A. (2023). The effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on the gender gap in research productivity within academia. elife, 12, e85427. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.85427
Li, Y., & Zhang, L. J. (2022). Influence of mentorship and the working environment on English as a foreign language teachers’ research productivity: The mediation role of research motivation and self-efficacy. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 906932. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.906932
Madero Gómez, S. M. (2019). Factores de la teoría de Herzberg y el impacto de los incentivos en la satisfacción de los trabajadores. Acta universitaria, 29, e2153. https://doi.org/10.15174/au.2019.2153
Manasia, L., Popa, D., & Ianos, G. (2022). Anatomy of research performance from a bottom-up approach: Examination of researchers’ perspective. Sustainability, 14(4), 2254. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14042254
Meza-Mejia, M. C., Villarreal-García, M. A., & Ortega-Barba, C. F. (2023). Women and leadership in higher education: A systematic review. Social Sciences, 12(10), 555. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci12100555
Momeni, F., Karimi, F., Mayr, P., Peters, I., & Dietze, S. (2022). The many facets of academic mobility and its impact on scholars' careers. Journal of Informetrics, 16(2), 101280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2022.101280
Nguyen, T. D., Nguyen, D. N., & Dao, K. T. (2022). Management factors influencing lecturers’ research productivity in Vietnam National University, Hanoi, Vietnam: A structural equation modeling analysis. Heliyon, 8(10), e10510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10510
Nygaard, L. P., Aksnes, D. W., & Piro, F. N. (2022a). Identifying gender disparities in research performance: The importance of comparing apples with apples. Higher Education, 84, 1127–1142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00820-0
Nygaard, L. P., Piro, F. N., & Aksnes, D. W. (2022b). Gendering excellence through research productivity indicators. Gender and Education, 34(6), 690–704. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2022.2041186
Obando, G., Pontón, T., Parada, S. E., & Villa, J. A. (2020). Research into cognition and numerical thinking in Colombia. Studies in Psychology, 41(2), 319-347. https://doi.org/10.1080/02109395.2020.1748841
Padilla Yaá, Z. I., & Barrera Rojas, M. A. (2025). Una revisión documental de la evolución del concepto de brecha digital. Sintaxis, (15), 158-174. https://doi.org/10.36105/stx.2025n15.10
Puertas, R., Martí, L., & García-Álvarez-Coque, J. M. (2023). Are female researchers more efficient? An analysis of gender in a Spanish technological university. Scientometrics, 128(11), 6611–6632. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-023-04844-w
Rachid, E., Noureddine, T., Tamim, H., Makki, M., Naalbandian, S., & Al-Haddad, C. (2021). Gender disparity in research productivity across departments in the faculty of medicine: A bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics, 126(6), 4715–4731. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-03958-3
Ramezani, S. G., Azizi, N., & Siri, A. (2026). Women's research productivity in academia: A systematic review of challenges and solutions. Higher Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-025-01576-z
Reyes Cruz, M. D. R., & Hernández Méndez, E. (2014). Productividad y condiciones para la investigación: el caso de los profesores de lenguas extranjeras. Sinéctica, (42), 1-17. https://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?pid=S1665-109X2014000100011&script=sci_abstract&tlng=pt
Rosero, A., Montenegro, G. y Pinchao, L. (2016). La relación investigación-docencia en el ámbito universitario. ¿Utopía o realidad? Revista Criterios, 23(1), 181-19 https://revistas.umariana.edu.co/Criterios/article/view/1793
Ryan, R., & Deci, E. L. (2000). La Teoría de la Autodeterminación y la Facilitación de la Motivación Intrínseca, el Desarrollo Social, y el Bienestar. American psychologist, 55(1), 68-78. https://www.selfdeterminationtheory.org/SDT/documents/2000_RyanDeci_SpanishAmPsych.pdf
Sá, C., Cowley, S., Shahrin, B., Stevenson, C., & Su, A. (2023). Disciplinary gender balance, research productivity, and recognition of men and women in academia. PLOS ONE, 18(12), e0293080. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0293080
Sandoval Caraveo, M. del C. (2021). Concepto y dimensiones del clima organizacional. Hitos De Ciencias Económico Administrativas, 10(27), 83-88. https://doi.org/10.19136/hitos.a10n27.4402
Sarmiento, M. B., & Ramírez, E. P. (2023). Capacidades institucionales de los gobiernos subnacionales en periodos de crisis: el caso del departamento de Santander en Colombia, 2020-2022. Papel Político, 28. https://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/papelpol/article/download/37305/30190
Sayyed, M. A. (2024). Research productivity and quality among university faculty members: Evidence from publication and citation indicators. SAGE Open. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241237050
Serra, J. N., & Tovar, J. B. (2011). La productividad investigativa del docente universitario. Orbis. Revista Científica Ciencias Humanas, 6(18), 116-140. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=3633050
Serrano de Moreno, M. S., Castellanos Herrera, S. J., & Andrade, D. J. (2024). Competencias en investigación del profesorado universitario: Desafíos en la construcción de la cultura investigativa. Revista De Ciencias Sociales, 30(1), 381-397. https://doi.org/10.31876/rcs.v30i1.41662
Song, Y., Liu, Y., & Wei, J. (2025). Factors influencing university teachers’ research productivity: Evidence from academic career characteristics and institutional context. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/09610006241264824
Stupnisky, R. H., & Salahuddin, N. (2025). Faculty motivation and research productivity in higher education: Examining psychological factors influencing scholarly performance. Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-025-01546-5
Supo, A. (2014). Perspectivas de la evaluación cualitativa en educación. Investigación Educativa, 7(10), 80-91. https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/educa/article/view/8155
Varsha, P. S., Chakraborty, A., & Kar, A. K. (2024). How to undertake an impactful literature review: Understanding review approaches and guidelines for high-impact systematic literature reviews. Vision: The Journal of Business Perspective, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/22779779241227654
Zhang, Y., Zhang, Y., & Li, J. (2023). How is personality related to research performance? The mediating effect of research engagement. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1257166. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1257166
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2026 Estrategia y Gestión Universitaria
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
